High school student Sadie Harper and her younger sister Sawyer are reeling from the recent death of their mother and aren’t getting much support from their father, Will, a therapist who is dealing with his own pain. When a desperate patient unexpectedly shows up at their home seeking help, he leaves behind a terrifying supernatural entity that preys on families and feeds on the suffering of its victims.
Director Rob Savage (Host, Dashcam) has put his money on the barrel-head, and reputation on the line, by declaring that his adaptation of Stephen King‘s short story, The Boogeyman, is the most “viscerally scary” of all time. TODAY (June 2nd) horror-loving moviegoers—a hard lot to satisfy—will have something to say about that as the film rolls out in wide release, one way or another.
King’s original psychological short story was first published in 1973 in an issue of the magazine Cavalier, and later collected in King’s 1978 anthology Night Shift, so it’s been begging to be produced for the big screen for some time now. It’s never easy adapting a Stephen King story or novela, adapting a feature film from an 8-pager, even more so. But Savage has been up to the challenge on several fronts, but not all.
There is a strange marketing dichotomy at play for The Boogeyman, which posits that the movie did so well in early testing—fright-wise—that 20th Century Studios decided it was worthy of a theatrical release (it was originally destined to be a straight-to-stream on Hulu.) The flip-side is that we’re at a loss to explain why it was given a PG13 rating (for terror, violent content, teen drug use and some strong language), even as the film begins with a VERY R-rated moment out-the-box to mark its territory. But most will either find The Boogeyman scary or not and there’s not much room in between. And that, my friends, is at the crux of the film: you’re either going to love it or not.
In most countries whose cultures echo “the Boogeyman” mythos, like El Cuco in México, Puerto Rico and Latin America, Baba Yaga in Russia, Butzemann in Germany or Gurumapa in Nepal, for example, simply stating that it will get you rather than describing how the creature looks, is what elevates the horror factor ten-fold because your mind fills in the blanks. Parents around the world looking to sternly coax their wired children to go to bed or young finicky eaters to finish their meal, exfoliate their stress with the power of this knowledge and simple trick! Wise storytellers like Savage know this, too.
Here Rob Savage does an excellent job of keeping our minds working overtime as the creature is teased out against the inky-black background and economically revealed to perfection throughout. The most effective moments take place during the silence as we await banal moments to pass, like when a lit moon globe (a modern-day replacement for a comfort blanket) is dropped and rolls across the room into a dark corner. YIKES! Savage is definitely holding onto the helming reins tightly and moving us along with grace–he’s been here before.
Sophie Thatcher and Vivien Lyra Blair shine as two sisters coping with the recent death of their mother, and are the crown jewels of the movie. Thatcher plays the distant teenager Sadie (16), and Blair is 11 year-old Sawyer who is years more conscious of the pending danger in their midst, and, as it will turn out, the more proactive in dealing with it. We can only hope that we’re seeing the emergence of a new generation of ‘final girls’ in the genre with Vivien Lyra Blair leading the way as she echoes the ever-green queen of final girls, Jamie Lee Curtis, even at this tender age. Yes, more of that!
Chris Messina plays their father, Dr. Will Harper, a psychiatrist who having suffered a great loss is adept at listening to the mental ailments of his patients but unable to digest the same advice and guided counsel he dispenses on a regular basis himself. Thus, the possibility of another pending catastrophic episode renders him impotent as a father figure, even as he’s the model modern dad. Healing thyself is just not in the cards for him. Messina straddles that fine line without blinking or breaking a sweat.
Another stand-out performance is delivered by chameleon actor David Dastmalchian as the nervously disheveled Lester, who shows up unannounced at Harper’s home office seeking help during a triggered mental episode. You can feel the air leaving the theater during that short but powerfully acted and directed scene as he describes the concurrent deaths of his three daughters by various means, but all connected by one constant: the Boogeyman, he claims. I got the creeps waiting for Lester to lurch forward and potentially break his therapist in half! At this point, not only do WE find ourselves hypnotized and at the edge of our seats, Dr. Harper has been so affected by the strange visitor’s story that he excuses himself to call the cops. But it’s too late as Lester has already left behind much more than just a bone-chilling tale. Talk about the complex mechanizations of the mind. Yes, more of that! (kudo to writers Scott Beck, Bryan Woods and Mark Heyman for that rollercoaster ride!)
The film could have fared better without the formulaic troupe of the misunderstood teenager chastised by her schoolmates after a tragic incident. But having included it, eventual Karma should have befallen them at the hands, ahh, I mean claws, of the specter whose existence hearkens from a time immemorial. I was taken out of the film for a moment as soon as I was led into that cookie-cutout space. Meh. Precious screen time could have been better allotted to character development or added backstory. No more of that! (wagging a finger at writers Beck, Woods and Heyman for that lazy short cut)
The cinematography (Eli Born) and production design (Jeremy Woodward) are huge complements to the film and underscore the psychological horror, mental instability and trauma at the core of the storyline. Comparisons have been made to Smile, Slender Man, and The Babadook. You can pass your own judgement on that. Either way, the atmosphere is both thick and alluring in a “this way to your doom” sort of way. On that level, the movie is very effective.
Final thoughts: While Steven Spielberg’s JAWS made us afraid to go into the water (or at least do a double take before doing so), Rob Savage’s The Boogeyman will not be the movie that keeps you from turning off your night light or prompt you to hesitate opening the closet door. There’s just not enough miedo gravitas for die-hard horror fans or jaded professional horror aficionados like myself.
ON THE OTHER CLAW, there are a lot of reasonably zippy jump-scares (a few actually got both me and LH’s Christian Morán!), the heightened tension and suspense is first-rate, and the cast and acting is directed with precision. The Boogeyman is one of those genre films that is best served by viewing it in a large, dark theater with a large group of less-than-calloused movie-goers (perhaps the method to the madness of MPAA‘s PG13 rating). The Boogeyman is also a good first date snuggle watch, for sure. 😉
I know: I giveth and then taketh away. But that’s how the film perplexed me. The Boogeyman is currently faring better with audiences than reviewers/critics on Rotten Taomatoes, with a 63%/70% split (as of this writing), so there’s that. Perhaps I need a session on Dr. Harper’s couch…
Straight streamer or theater worthy? Did the PG13 rating help or hinder the film? Let us know what YOU think.
Comments